Rural Gen Z Turnout Is Rising. That Matters.
Data from CIRCLE at Tufts University reveal a trend that received far less national attention than it deserved: young rural voters turned out at notably higher rates in 2024, narrowing a turnout gap that has persisted for more than a decade. While overall youth participation held steady at roughly 47 percent, CIRCLE’s geographic analysis shows that rural youth turnout rose more than urban youth turnout, shrinking the long-standing rural and urban divide (CIRCLE, 2024 Youth Vote State & Demographic Analysis).
Much of this increase was concentrated in small towns, micropolitan counties, and rural regions where schools, local organizations, and community-based civic efforts have strengthened youth engagement infrastructure since 2020. CIRCLE notes that rural youth voting surged in several states with expanded access, particularly those offering same-day registration, pre-registration, or broad mail voting options. This points to the critical role policy design plays in whether young people in rural communities can realistically participate.
The data also make clear that rural youth are not a monolithic group. In many rural states, turnout among 18 to 21 year olds lagged slightly behind older Gen Z cohorts. Still, the overall rise was driven by young people who reported stronger local attachments, greater trust in community institutions, and a desire to weigh in on economic issues close to home (CIRCLE, 2024 Youth Motivation Findings). This aligns closely with the philosophy behind RUBI’s Community Works Initiative. When we connect with others, we strengthen our communities and our democracy.
Importantly, the narrowing regional gap appears to reflect changes in opportunity rather than partisanship. Rural youth who voted in 2024 were more likely than past cohorts to cite concrete, place-based concerns such as job pathways, affordability, agriculture policy, and community well-being as motivating factors. CIRCLE’s findings suggest that when rural young people see voting connected to their lived experience, turnout increases in ways that transcend national political narratives. As RUBI leaders have said through the Beyond Resistance campaign, people need something to fight for, not just something to fight against.
Taken together, the 2024 data point to a quiet transformation. Rural young voters are showing up, and the rural and urban turnout gap is no longer a fixed feature of American politics. For campaigns, civic groups, and bridge-building institutions, the message is clear. Investing in rural youth engagement is not only possible. It is already reshaping participation patterns on the ground.